How would "currency" be a real world asset? The USD is a currency, but it is not money, and is certainly not an asset; its value literally becomes worth less every day. Gold, silver, guns, ammo, land, tractors (not John Deere) and food animals, those are all real world assets. I only keep enough currency around to meet short term liabilities. Maybe I've got my definition of currency and or asset wrong.
"Hold real world assets, currency, food, energy, community outside the system whenever possible"
I'm pretty sure he wasn't calling currency an asset. It was just one of the things he thinks you should hold outside of the system, including real world assets.
Fink The Fink also revealed a few months ago that this is the real purpose for these datacenters, to process all these tokens at once; and on top of that, he says the trillions of dollars needed to build them will come from private savings accounts, retirement and pension funds.
Great post Christian. Your young boys are so lucky to have a father that gets it and teaches them to see through the illusion. Thanks so much for all your hard work.
Mercantilism, The Long Trick ~ explained to a six-year-old {unbekoming substack}
Once upon a time, a very long time ago, there was a city built in the water. It was called Venice. Venice was full of merchants. Merchants are people who buy things in one place and sail them somewhere else to sell them for more money. The merchants in Venice were very clever, and very greedy. They built hundreds of ships. They sailed everywhere — to Africa, to the Middle East, all the way to China. And they made a deal with their king. They said: “You let us do whatever we want. And we will make you rich too.” The king said yes. So that is what they did. They sold spices and silk and gold. They sold ships. They even sold weapons and slaves — sometimes to the enemies of their own friends. They did not care. They got richer and richer.
After a long time, other countries got angry at Venice. They ganged up on the little water-city. Venice was in big trouble. So the merchants did something clever. Instead of staying to fight, they packed up their money, their ships and their tricks — and they moved. First they moved to a city called Amsterdam, in Holland. Then they moved to a city called London, in England. They brought all their cleverness with them. And the kings of Holland and England said: “Yes please, come in. Make us rich too.”
Now here is where the story gets really interesting. In London, in the year 1694, the merchants thought up the cleverest trick of all. They went to the king, who needed lots of money to fight a war with France. They said: “We will lend you the money. But here is the secret — we don’t really have the money. We will just write numbers on pieces of paper and give you the paper. You have to say the paper is real. And you have to pay us back, with real money from taxes, forever and ever.” The king said yes. And that is how the Bank of England was born. A small group of men were now allowed to make money out of thin air. Not coins. Not gold. Just paper. And everyone in the whole country had to pretend the paper was real. The men who made the paper got very, very rich. The king got to fight his wars. And who paid for it all? The ordinary people. They worked hard, and they paid taxes forever, to pay back money that was never really there to begin with.
This trick has a name. It is called a central bank.
And once it started, it never stopped.
When America became its own country, a man called Alexander Hamilton said: “Let’s do the same trick here.” So America got a central bank too. Then another one. And then another. And in 1913, America got the biggest one of all. It is called the Federal Reserve, and it is still there today.
But between London in 1694 and America in 1913, a lot of years passed.
Who ran the trick all through those years?
The big family. A man called Meyer Amschel Rothschild lived in Germany. He had five sons. He sent each son to a different big city — London, Paris, Vienna, Naples, and back home in Frankfurt. Five brothers, five cities, one family. This was very clever. When there was a war in one country, the brothers could move the family’s money to a safer country. When a king needed to borrow, a Rothschild brother was already living in his capital, ready to lend. For almost a hundred years, whenever a country in Europe needed money to fight a war or build a railway or pay its bills, it went to the Rothschilds. The family grew so rich that nobody could count how much they had. Then at the end of the 1800s, a new family in New York — the Morgans — took over from the Rothschilds in America. Their bank had actually started in London years before, with help from a Rothschild loan. The trick kept moving. The last name on the door kept changing. The trick stayed the same.
By 1913, when the Federal Reserve was being built, it was the Morgans and the Rockefellers and a few other big families who quietly wrote the rules. They even held a secret meeting on a tiny island called Jekyll Island to plan the whole thing. Nobody was allowed to ask too many questions about any of this.
The whole world joins in. In 1971, America’s president, Mr. Nixon, did something even bigger. For a long time, American paper money had been backed by gold — which meant you could swap the paper for real gold if you wanted. That was the last bit of honesty left. Mr. Nixon said: “No more. Our paper is backed by nothing now. It’s just paper because we say so.” And because America was very strong, the whole world had to use American paper. So now the trick wasn’t just being played on Americans. It was being played on everyone, everywhere.
The merchants did another clever thing. The hiding places. They found tiny little islands — places like the Cayman Islands and Jersey and Bermuda — and they turned them into hiding places for rich people’s money. No rules. No taxes. No questions. Just hiding. Here is how strange it is. The tiny island of Cayman has only one cinema. But the banks on Cayman have four times more money than all the banks in New York City. That is not because the people who live on Cayman are rich. It is because rich people from everywhere else hide their money there.
So what is mercantilism? Here is the whole story, in one sentence.
A small group of merchants figured out how to make money out of nothing, get governments to protect them, and hide the money so nobody could tax it. And everyone else has to pay.
That is mercantilism. It started in Venice. It moved to Amsterdam. It moved to London. It moved to New York. And now it lives on little islands and inside big computers, all around the world. The names have changed. The clothes have changed. The kings are called presidents. The merchants are called bankers. The family names have changed too — Medici, Rothschild, Morgan, and so on — but the trick is the same trick.
First hubby and I are so happy you are sitting there with your boys explaining to them our history. Oh how I wish more parents would teach in such a way to catch the real meaning behind the setting up of this country- a God ordained plan. Our declaration could never have been written by mere men with good intentions. The Declaration was God breathed in its wisdom. But as time goes by the evil hearts of men with their greed will keep going deeper to take from and govern over the trusting men and women living the sweet life God intended. But all are still accountable to acknowledge Jesus Christ. If that wasn’t the purpose of establishing this nation then what’s the point of it all? He is the point, but in man’s preoccupation with self, has moved on without God. So what we see now is the corruption of all things meant for good.
Sorry to rattle on, but thank you for all you do and share in your podcasts. Very much needed.
Not sure the 100 million native American Indians who were slaughtered by white European settlers to build this great nation would agree with you. But hey, we're all God's children right?
Nobody selects ‘preserve individual autonomy’ or ‘limit institutional power’ as the driving ethic, because those do not generate infrastructure — they dismantle it.
The historian Margaret Manale argued the problem runs deeper. In a functionalist civilisation — one that defines things by what they do in a system rather than by what they are — the system does not merely adopt ethics, it generates them. ISO’s standards are compartmentalised. The result is the complete architecture is assembled from components developed independently by professionals who understood only their own part. When environmental monitoring data flows into integrated assessment models, which generate scenarios, which set capital requirements, which are formatted as ISO standards, which are evaluated by AI, which determines whether an ISO 20022 transaction clears — the result is a closed-loop system.
The completed assembly is a system in which an ETHIC that no electorate chose is translated into a STANDARD that no parliament wrote, MEASURED by instruments that no citizen can inspect, EVALUATED by AI that no voter governs and ENFORCED through money that will not move unless the evaluation passes. Each individual step in the process is mundane, technical and unobjectionable. The system they compose is not.
Cash — which carries no purpose code, no party identifier, no structured data — is the principal remaining uncontrolled input. Its elimination is a structural requirement of the architecture, not merely a policy preference.
Citizen’s democratic input is diluted at every stage. Elections still happen, the parliament sits and the government still supposedly governs. But the decisions that determine what counts as sustainable, as ‘good governance’, what gets funded, what your money can buy and under what conditions — these are made in ISO committee rooms that are listed on a website that nobody visits, producing documents that nobody reads, following a process that nobody monitors.
The destination is an automated planetary management system — what Buckminster Fuller called Spaceship Earth. A system hidden by compartmentalism and tedium. Standardise, measure, correct — from compatible screws through European integration to conditional money, in seventy-nine years of unobjectionable steps, all claimed to serve a ‘common good’ no-one was ever informed would eventually be used to adaptively anticipate and control society without democratic input. {ESC substack}
With all of this noble global, multidirectional, comprehensive organizational programming - not one of these organizations has stopped mRNA poisoning, pollution, mining destruction, the arms trade, wars and ultimately the democidal Global Financial Elite (500 uber wealthy Satanic families and the Central Banksters who serve them) who are responsible for today's planetary nightmare.
Replace the 'ethical' SDGs with racial purity, and you're in Nazi Germany. Replace with 'duty towards the collective' and you're in the Soviet Union. Replace it with 'Silly Hat Thursdays', and . . .
• The NGFS would produce silly hat scenarios.
• The Basel Committee would translate them into capital requirements for hat- deficient entities.
• ISO would publish a hat management system standard.
• FATF would grey-list jurisdictions with insufficient hat compliance.
• CBAM would levy charges on imports from countries with low hat-wearing rates.
• CBDC payment at the coffee shop would clear, conditional on hat verification.
And it would feel normal. Because the ethic would have been endorsed by the Vatican, the Crown and the scientific consensus. The IPCC equivalent would have published hat-necessity projections. The SDG equivalent would include Universal Hat Access as Goal 18. The MSM would explain why hat resistance is rooted in privilege. The platforms would flag hat-scepticism as misinformation. And anyone who said 'this is insane, it's just hats' would be told they were a hat-denier threatening public safety.
Should a system which can enforce something that obviously silly with identical efficiency even be allowed to exist? {ESC substack}
Thanks for all of your hard work and information. I stopped voting and it seems that many believe that their vote does count. If it makes them feel better then vote. It seems to be the only thing we can do to change things, but in reality not so much. Maybe it is better than it all collapses or rather that this group will implode. Wishful thinking, but a guy can dream a bit. Stay safe
“Politics is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex.” {Frank Zappa}. Voting is a humiliation ritual. Elections would not be allowed if they made any real difference. I saw a revealing image recently. It was a father driving with his daughter in the passenger seat with one of those kid steering wheels that makes them think they are steering too. The caption was: "Voting: giving grown adults the illusion of control."
THE GREAT RESIST: They will own nobody, and they will be unhappy.
Dear Globalists,
“We the People” have reviewed your proposal for “The Great Reset” and we regret to inform you that we will have to decline at this time. Although we did find the free trial of the “New World Order” very interesting, we have decided instead to go with “The Great Awakening”.
How would "currency" be a real world asset? The USD is a currency, but it is not money, and is certainly not an asset; its value literally becomes worth less every day. Gold, silver, guns, ammo, land, tractors (not John Deere) and food animals, those are all real world assets. I only keep enough currency around to meet short term liabilities. Maybe I've got my definition of currency and or asset wrong.
"Hold real world assets, currency, food, energy, community outside the system whenever possible"
I'm pretty sure he wasn't calling currency an asset. It was just one of the things he thinks you should hold outside of the system, including real world assets.
You're not wrong in the least.
Fink The Fink also revealed a few months ago that this is the real purpose for these datacenters, to process all these tokens at once; and on top of that, he says the trillions of dollars needed to build them will come from private savings accounts, retirement and pension funds.
https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/tokenization-blackrock-and-brookfield
https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/larry-fink-admits-trillions-of-dollars
Thanks again for your hard work, Christian!
Great post Christian. Your young boys are so lucky to have a father that gets it and teaches them to see through the illusion. Thanks so much for all your hard work.
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
Mercantilism, The Long Trick ~ explained to a six-year-old {unbekoming substack}
Once upon a time, a very long time ago, there was a city built in the water. It was called Venice. Venice was full of merchants. Merchants are people who buy things in one place and sail them somewhere else to sell them for more money. The merchants in Venice were very clever, and very greedy. They built hundreds of ships. They sailed everywhere — to Africa, to the Middle East, all the way to China. And they made a deal with their king. They said: “You let us do whatever we want. And we will make you rich too.” The king said yes. So that is what they did. They sold spices and silk and gold. They sold ships. They even sold weapons and slaves — sometimes to the enemies of their own friends. They did not care. They got richer and richer.
After a long time, other countries got angry at Venice. They ganged up on the little water-city. Venice was in big trouble. So the merchants did something clever. Instead of staying to fight, they packed up their money, their ships and their tricks — and they moved. First they moved to a city called Amsterdam, in Holland. Then they moved to a city called London, in England. They brought all their cleverness with them. And the kings of Holland and England said: “Yes please, come in. Make us rich too.”
Now here is where the story gets really interesting. In London, in the year 1694, the merchants thought up the cleverest trick of all. They went to the king, who needed lots of money to fight a war with France. They said: “We will lend you the money. But here is the secret — we don’t really have the money. We will just write numbers on pieces of paper and give you the paper. You have to say the paper is real. And you have to pay us back, with real money from taxes, forever and ever.” The king said yes. And that is how the Bank of England was born. A small group of men were now allowed to make money out of thin air. Not coins. Not gold. Just paper. And everyone in the whole country had to pretend the paper was real. The men who made the paper got very, very rich. The king got to fight his wars. And who paid for it all? The ordinary people. They worked hard, and they paid taxes forever, to pay back money that was never really there to begin with.
This trick has a name. It is called a central bank.
And once it started, it never stopped.
When America became its own country, a man called Alexander Hamilton said: “Let’s do the same trick here.” So America got a central bank too. Then another one. And then another. And in 1913, America got the biggest one of all. It is called the Federal Reserve, and it is still there today.
But between London in 1694 and America in 1913, a lot of years passed.
Who ran the trick all through those years?
The big family. A man called Meyer Amschel Rothschild lived in Germany. He had five sons. He sent each son to a different big city — London, Paris, Vienna, Naples, and back home in Frankfurt. Five brothers, five cities, one family. This was very clever. When there was a war in one country, the brothers could move the family’s money to a safer country. When a king needed to borrow, a Rothschild brother was already living in his capital, ready to lend. For almost a hundred years, whenever a country in Europe needed money to fight a war or build a railway or pay its bills, it went to the Rothschilds. The family grew so rich that nobody could count how much they had. Then at the end of the 1800s, a new family in New York — the Morgans — took over from the Rothschilds in America. Their bank had actually started in London years before, with help from a Rothschild loan. The trick kept moving. The last name on the door kept changing. The trick stayed the same.
By 1913, when the Federal Reserve was being built, it was the Morgans and the Rockefellers and a few other big families who quietly wrote the rules. They even held a secret meeting on a tiny island called Jekyll Island to plan the whole thing. Nobody was allowed to ask too many questions about any of this.
The whole world joins in. In 1971, America’s president, Mr. Nixon, did something even bigger. For a long time, American paper money had been backed by gold — which meant you could swap the paper for real gold if you wanted. That was the last bit of honesty left. Mr. Nixon said: “No more. Our paper is backed by nothing now. It’s just paper because we say so.” And because America was very strong, the whole world had to use American paper. So now the trick wasn’t just being played on Americans. It was being played on everyone, everywhere.
The merchants did another clever thing. The hiding places. They found tiny little islands — places like the Cayman Islands and Jersey and Bermuda — and they turned them into hiding places for rich people’s money. No rules. No taxes. No questions. Just hiding. Here is how strange it is. The tiny island of Cayman has only one cinema. But the banks on Cayman have four times more money than all the banks in New York City. That is not because the people who live on Cayman are rich. It is because rich people from everywhere else hide their money there.
So what is mercantilism? Here is the whole story, in one sentence.
A small group of merchants figured out how to make money out of nothing, get governments to protect them, and hide the money so nobody could tax it. And everyone else has to pay.
That is mercantilism. It started in Venice. It moved to Amsterdam. It moved to London. It moved to New York. And now it lives on little islands and inside big computers, all around the world. The names have changed. The clothes have changed. The kings are called presidents. The merchants are called bankers. The family names have changed too — Medici, Rothschild, Morgan, and so on — but the trick is the same trick.
It was never stopped.
It was just moved.
First hubby and I are so happy you are sitting there with your boys explaining to them our history. Oh how I wish more parents would teach in such a way to catch the real meaning behind the setting up of this country- a God ordained plan. Our declaration could never have been written by mere men with good intentions. The Declaration was God breathed in its wisdom. But as time goes by the evil hearts of men with their greed will keep going deeper to take from and govern over the trusting men and women living the sweet life God intended. But all are still accountable to acknowledge Jesus Christ. If that wasn’t the purpose of establishing this nation then what’s the point of it all? He is the point, but in man’s preoccupation with self, has moved on without God. So what we see now is the corruption of all things meant for good.
Sorry to rattle on, but thank you for all you do and share in your podcasts. Very much needed.
Not sure the 100 million native American Indians who were slaughtered by white European settlers to build this great nation would agree with you. But hey, we're all God's children right?
Global standardization
Nobody selects ‘preserve individual autonomy’ or ‘limit institutional power’ as the driving ethic, because those do not generate infrastructure — they dismantle it.
The historian Margaret Manale argued the problem runs deeper. In a functionalist civilisation — one that defines things by what they do in a system rather than by what they are — the system does not merely adopt ethics, it generates them. ISO’s standards are compartmentalised. The result is the complete architecture is assembled from components developed independently by professionals who understood only their own part. When environmental monitoring data flows into integrated assessment models, which generate scenarios, which set capital requirements, which are formatted as ISO standards, which are evaluated by AI, which determines whether an ISO 20022 transaction clears — the result is a closed-loop system.
The completed assembly is a system in which an ETHIC that no electorate chose is translated into a STANDARD that no parliament wrote, MEASURED by instruments that no citizen can inspect, EVALUATED by AI that no voter governs and ENFORCED through money that will not move unless the evaluation passes. Each individual step in the process is mundane, technical and unobjectionable. The system they compose is not.
Cash — which carries no purpose code, no party identifier, no structured data — is the principal remaining uncontrolled input. Its elimination is a structural requirement of the architecture, not merely a policy preference.
Citizen’s democratic input is diluted at every stage. Elections still happen, the parliament sits and the government still supposedly governs. But the decisions that determine what counts as sustainable, as ‘good governance’, what gets funded, what your money can buy and under what conditions — these are made in ISO committee rooms that are listed on a website that nobody visits, producing documents that nobody reads, following a process that nobody monitors.
The destination is an automated planetary management system — what Buckminster Fuller called Spaceship Earth. A system hidden by compartmentalism and tedium. Standardise, measure, correct — from compatible screws through European integration to conditional money, in seventy-nine years of unobjectionable steps, all claimed to serve a ‘common good’ no-one was ever informed would eventually be used to adaptively anticipate and control society without democratic input. {ESC substack}
With all of this noble global, multidirectional, comprehensive organizational programming - not one of these organizations has stopped mRNA poisoning, pollution, mining destruction, the arms trade, wars and ultimately the democidal Global Financial Elite (500 uber wealthy Satanic families and the Central Banksters who serve them) who are responsible for today's planetary nightmare.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The system they construct is context-agnostic.
Replace the 'ethical' SDGs with racial purity, and you're in Nazi Germany. Replace with 'duty towards the collective' and you're in the Soviet Union. Replace it with 'Silly Hat Thursdays', and . . .
• The NGFS would produce silly hat scenarios.
• The Basel Committee would translate them into capital requirements for hat- deficient entities.
• ISO would publish a hat management system standard.
• FATF would grey-list jurisdictions with insufficient hat compliance.
• CBAM would levy charges on imports from countries with low hat-wearing rates.
• CBDC payment at the coffee shop would clear, conditional on hat verification.
And it would feel normal. Because the ethic would have been endorsed by the Vatican, the Crown and the scientific consensus. The IPCC equivalent would have published hat-necessity projections. The SDG equivalent would include Universal Hat Access as Goal 18. The MSM would explain why hat resistance is rooted in privilege. The platforms would flag hat-scepticism as misinformation. And anyone who said 'this is insane, it's just hats' would be told they were a hat-denier threatening public safety.
Should a system which can enforce something that obviously silly with identical efficiency even be allowed to exist? {ESC substack}
Thanks for all of your hard work and information. I stopped voting and it seems that many believe that their vote does count. If it makes them feel better then vote. It seems to be the only thing we can do to change things, but in reality not so much. Maybe it is better than it all collapses or rather that this group will implode. Wishful thinking, but a guy can dream a bit. Stay safe
“Politics is the entertainment division of the military industrial complex.” {Frank Zappa}. Voting is a humiliation ritual. Elections would not be allowed if they made any real difference. I saw a revealing image recently. It was a father driving with his daughter in the passenger seat with one of those kid steering wheels that makes them think they are steering too. The caption was: "Voting: giving grown adults the illusion of control."
I've Been Everywhere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpiYeJXBMdA&list=RDmpiYeJXBMdA&start_radio=1
Happy Independence Day !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ug7udnfbcE
The last phase of the Empire is collapse into the Technate. No one will have anything by the time 2030 comes around.
THE GREAT RESIST: They will own nobody, and they will be unhappy.
Dear Globalists,
“We the People” have reviewed your proposal for “The Great Reset” and we regret to inform you that we will have to decline at this time. Although we did find the free trial of the “New World Order” very interesting, we have decided instead to go with “The Great Awakening”.
Yours sincerely; The Human Race.
Another Lucky Larry screwing the common people.
Brain Puzzler: Where in the Bible does God give the guidelines and instructions for human self-rule?