UK here. I'm getting texts on behalf of water company to replace existing meter inside my home for a SMART one. I've just watched promotional video, about saving water, being able to locate leaks quicker, all sounds marvellous. Installation consists of replacing meter, affixing a receiver/antennae on roof, access to electricity - meter uses 7w per day, around £20 per annum, the installer said, not charged to customer??? Using customer electricity so how does that work? I certainly don't get these carbon taxes/credits, supposed offsetting/tokenisation business. I don't think majority do so not many comments. Obviously, being able to shut off someone's power or water is worrying, if rationed, but from a privacy point of view, your personal habits, like bed time, how many baths or showers you take, washing loads, or vacations, will, or could easily be known.
Thank you very much for writing this article. I feel like I have been screaming about this particular issue for a very long time now and you have just given it a proper read. Hugs and love from Idaho!
Suzirhae gave me the link to your post. It seems we're on the same exact page about the water agenda. I'd say it's ironic, but I think sinister is more the word that fits. I wrote a post called Data Centers Are Water Siphoning Centers that covers much of the same stuff. Think you'd like it.
Replace the 'ethical' SDGs with racial purity, and you're in Nazi Germany. Replace with 'duty towards the collective' and you're in the Soviet Union. Replace it with 'Silly Hat Thursdays', and . . .
• The NGFS would produce silly hat scenarios.
• The Basel Committee would translate them into capital requirements for hat- deficient entities.
• ISO would publish a hat management system standard.
• FATF would grey-list jurisdictions with insufficient hat compliance.
• CBAM would levy charges on imports from countries with low hat-wearing rates.
• CBDC payment at the coffee shop would clear, conditional on hat verification.
And it would feel normal. Because the ethic would have been endorsed by the Vatican, the Crown and the scientific consensus. The IPCC equivalent would have published hat-necessity projections. The SDG equivalent would include Universal Hat Access as Goal 18. The MSM would explain why hat resistance is rooted in privilege. The platforms would flag hat-scepticism as misinformation. And anyone who said 'this is insane, it's just hats' would be told they were a hat-denier threatening public safety.
A system which can enforce something this obviously silly, with identical efficiency, should not be allowed to exist. {ESC substack}
This is incredible and needs to be circulated widely as an assault on all life. Everything needs water to flourish and if the control that all is lost. Thank you for bringing this to our attention will share ♥️
Our Common Future 'The planning of societal change takes place decades before the public see any signs of the implementation. By this time, it is being sold to them in the form of a benefit. Under a “climate lockdown”, governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures. That's for openers. Most will never be able to see the plans behind these changes as they believe the cover story.
Change brought about on the back of something that appears beneficial to the public, then accept the change as necessary or for the “common good”. They are guilt tripped into accepting loss of rights and benefits through basic propaganda tools was lead.
Our Common Future as as set out in 1987 Brundtland Report by
Self Confessed Communist Gro Harlem Brundtland Mother of 'sustainable development'
former Norwegian Prime Minister and Chair of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Leading on to The Global Biodiversity Assessment of 1995 was a follow up to the Rio Conference in 1992 and the implementation of Sustainable Development.
Jim MacNeill was the lead author of the Brundtland Commission's landmark report, Our Common Future, completed in 1988 James William MacNeill, OC (April 22, 1928 – March 5, 2016) was a Canadian consultant, environmentalist, and international public servant.
UK here. I'm getting texts on behalf of water company to replace existing meter inside my home for a SMART one. I've just watched promotional video, about saving water, being able to locate leaks quicker, all sounds marvellous. Installation consists of replacing meter, affixing a receiver/antennae on roof, access to electricity - meter uses 7w per day, around £20 per annum, the installer said, not charged to customer??? Using customer electricity so how does that work? I certainly don't get these carbon taxes/credits, supposed offsetting/tokenisation business. I don't think majority do so not many comments. Obviously, being able to shut off someone's power or water is worrying, if rationed, but from a privacy point of view, your personal habits, like bed time, how many baths or showers you take, washing loads, or vacations, will, or could easily be known.
They were looking for an enemy to unite humanity. They made us the enemy.
.
The Common Enemy of Humanity is Man
.
We came up with the idea of pollution, global warming, 💦 water shortages, famine and the like will fit the bill.
.
They made us the enemy of the world
.
🟥 🎥 MEGA UK COLUMN SANDI ADAMS
https://mega.nz/folder/AjNhgAaS#DQY4aheCIRgLOQ-wf4jF1Q
The earth is 71% water that can easily be treated to freshwater for human use.
The idea of a Global Water Bankruptcy is total nonsense.
enter data centermaggedon
So aggravating! God see and knows all. He is my Ultimate Provider for all my needs.
Thank you very much for writing this article. I feel like I have been screaming about this particular issue for a very long time now and you have just given it a proper read. Hugs and love from Idaho!
👊Restacked📣
Suzirhae gave me the link to your post. It seems we're on the same exact page about the water agenda. I'd say it's ironic, but I think sinister is more the word that fits. I wrote a post called Data Centers Are Water Siphoning Centers that covers much of the same stuff. Think you'd like it.
https://substack.com/@quantumanimation/p-202638122
The system they construct is context-agnostic.
Replace the 'ethical' SDGs with racial purity, and you're in Nazi Germany. Replace with 'duty towards the collective' and you're in the Soviet Union. Replace it with 'Silly Hat Thursdays', and . . .
• The NGFS would produce silly hat scenarios.
• The Basel Committee would translate them into capital requirements for hat- deficient entities.
• ISO would publish a hat management system standard.
• FATF would grey-list jurisdictions with insufficient hat compliance.
• CBAM would levy charges on imports from countries with low hat-wearing rates.
• CBDC payment at the coffee shop would clear, conditional on hat verification.
And it would feel normal. Because the ethic would have been endorsed by the Vatican, the Crown and the scientific consensus. The IPCC equivalent would have published hat-necessity projections. The SDG equivalent would include Universal Hat Access as Goal 18. The MSM would explain why hat resistance is rooted in privilege. The platforms would flag hat-scepticism as misinformation. And anyone who said 'this is insane, it's just hats' would be told they were a hat-denier threatening public safety.
A system which can enforce something this obviously silly, with identical efficiency, should not be allowed to exist. {ESC substack}
By 2030 you will own nothing and be happy (to die).
All water for me (and my data centers) and a drop for thee.
This is incredible and needs to be circulated widely as an assault on all life. Everything needs water to flourish and if the control that all is lost. Thank you for bringing this to our attention will share ♥️
Oil and gas will be the first to be rationed via digital ID. This is the whole point of the Iran war.
https://rumble.com/v7cvjty-nothing-has-changed-simon-dixon-hard-talk-live.html
Watch video above starting at 1 hour: 22 minutes: 6 seconds
Oil and gas is touched upon at 1 hour: 48 minutes: 39 seconds
Our Common Future 'The planning of societal change takes place decades before the public see any signs of the implementation. By this time, it is being sold to them in the form of a benefit. Under a “climate lockdown”, governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures. That's for openers. Most will never be able to see the plans behind these changes as they believe the cover story.
Change brought about on the back of something that appears beneficial to the public, then accept the change as necessary or for the “common good”. They are guilt tripped into accepting loss of rights and benefits through basic propaganda tools was lead.
Our Common Future as as set out in 1987 Brundtland Report by
Self Confessed Communist Gro Harlem Brundtland Mother of 'sustainable development'
former Norwegian Prime Minister and Chair of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Leading on to The Global Biodiversity Assessment of 1995 was a follow up to the Rio Conference in 1992 and the implementation of Sustainable Development.
Jim MacNeill was the lead author of the Brundtland Commission's landmark report, Our Common Future, completed in 1988 James William MacNeill, OC (April 22, 1928 – March 5, 2016) was a Canadian consultant, environmentalist, and international public servant.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/mC8z7Mrr8DU7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO6ESTbPMaY - HOW TO DEMONIZE HUMANITY - PAST AND PRESENT
Does water ever leave the earth?
Yes